
A lot of magazine/website reviews said the Remedy had an "identity crisis" (is it a long-travel trail bike or is it a light freeride bike?) thing going on because of this versatiliy, and it seems this year Trek has "addressed" this.

So what to fill the gap between the Remedy and the Session FR? The "Scratch":

I think the Remedy is to compete with the Enduro, and the "Scratch" the SX.
I think it's a bad move by Trek. I think the Remedy sold well (sold out!) because it was neither a trail or freeride bike, but yet both a trail and freeride bike. I read this comment made by LarryFhan on mtbr.com forums:
"I've seen people come into the shop and look at Specialzed and leave with a Trek. I've seen people look at Trek and leave with a GT. I've never seen anyone come in to look at a Remedy and leave with anything else. Though, I have seen people look at a Specialized Pitch and leave with a Remedy!"
As I was walking to the shop to pick up my Remedy, a man wheelied past me test riding an R7, and bought it 10 mins later.
I do like the brown paint scheme though.

Oh, and Norco are doing some belt drive bikes for 2010...
UPDATE:
The "Scratch Air" seems to have filled the void:

It does seem like Trek have a lot of overlap in their model line this year.
No comments:
Post a Comment